- From: Peter Stadler <stadler@weber-gesamtausgabe.de>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:52:09 +0100
- To: Andrew Hankinson <andrew.hankinson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Glenn Linderman <v+smufl@g.nevcal.com>, public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
- Message-Id: <87F91FD5-FE76-435B-8E4D-90303DCF0B3E@weber-gesamtausgabe.de>
Yes, thanks Andrew, that’s exactly what I’m after. My SMuFL browser is still running with SMuFL version 1.18 and I was looking into updating it. For those who are interested, a recent (= built upon https://github.com/w3c/smufl/commit/c20330a858a6297ed5da45491a9c177531190a7c) Docker image can be found at Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/r/stadlerpeter/smufl-browser/ Cheers Peter > Am 17.01.2018 um 20:13 schrieb Andrew Hankinson <andrew.hankinson@gmail.com>: > > There are JSON metadata files that give the names, codepoints, and groups that glyphs belong to: > > https://github.com/w3c/smufl/tree/gh-pages/metadata > > It makes it easier to build sites like the SMuFL browser, which is what I suspect Peter is doing. > > http://edirom.de/smufl-browser/index > > -Andrew > >> On 17 Jan 2018, at 19:00, Glenn Linderman <v+smufl@g.nevcal.com> wrote: >> >> On 1/17/2018 1:40 AM, Peter Stadler wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> I’m looking for releases of the SMuFL metadata json files. I’m especially interested in the latest stable 1.2(?) version. At https://github.com/w3c/smufl there are no releases at all (as there had been at https://github.com/steinbergmedia/smufl). >>> My best guess is, that the official 1.2 version is from 2016-04-25 (as it states at https://w3c.github.io/smufl/gitbook/index.html); hence this would be commit https://github.com/w3c/smufl/commit/c20330a858a6297ed5da45491a9c177531190a7c? >>> Could this be tagged accordingly? Additionally, the reference at https://w3c.github.io/smufl/gitbook/specification/ranges.html should be updated to point at the new GitHub release page (my suggestion). >>> Many thanks for all the work >>> and all the best >>> Peter >> >> I didn't follow your links, but aren't SMuFL metadata a specification for font creators to follow, to provide data about their fonts that adhere to the SMuFL specification? In other words, I don't think there would be a SMuFL metadata file, but there should be a Bravura metadata file, and a metadata file for each other SMuFL-compliant font that is developed. >> >> > > -- Peter Stadler Carl-Maria-von-Weber-Gesamtausgabe Arbeitsstelle Detmold Hornsche Str. 39 D-32756 Detmold Tel. +49 5231 975-676 Fax: +49 5231 975-668 stadler at weber-gesamtausgabe.de www.weber-gesamtausgabe.de
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2018 07:52:38 UTC