- From: L Peter Deutsch <aemusic@major2nd.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 09:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
- CC: jeremy.sawruk@gmail.com, jsutton@dolphin-com.co.uk, mgood@makemusic.com, public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
> - The chairs are in agreement that, as per the XML ID spec > https://www.w3.org/TR/xml-id/, the only "interoperable" aspect of xml:id is > its uniqueness within a document. We're not allowed to impose special > syntactic constraints, or assign domain-specific semantics to the actual > content of the ID, so we consider it closed for MusicXML 3.1. An xml:id > must be an opaque label, and no more. I concur enthusiastically. I hope this conclusion will apply as well to whatever XML-based design may result from the MNX activity. L Peter Deutsch ----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 11 September 2017 16:56:42 UTC