Re: MNX design goal: reduction of "book-keeping and post-processing"

• From: Christof Schardt <christof@schardt.info>
• Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:46:54 +0200
• To: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
• Message-ID: <984958927.20170326174654@schardt.info>

> The proposal mentions as a design goal eliminating "the need for
> complex book-keeping and post-processing when parsing measures of
> music". Would it be possible that you succinctly describe some of
> the standard scenarios with which in mind this goal has been set? 

As an implementer of a musicxml-importer you have employ a lot of
extra structs to collect information while parsing and to evaluate
these things afterwards with respect to completeness, order, sanity and so
on. This is the result of the lack of more strict definitions.

Christof

Received on Sunday, 26 March 2017 15:47:25 UTC