- From: Daniel Spreadbury <D.Spreadbury@steinberg.de>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:09:13 +0000
- To: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
- Cc: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFB9FCB95F.2A64FE2A-ONC12580DC.00795A49-802580DC.0079B157@LocalDomain>
Hi Joe,
It is indeed intended that the value should scale according to the size of
the notehead, but the spec doesn't make that clear. I've added issue #70
to add some clarifying language to the spec for this case. I will also
have a think about whether any of the other engravingDefaults values need
similar clarification.
Daniel
From: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
To: Daniel Spreadbury <D.Spreadbury@steinberg.de>,
public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
Date: 07/03/2017 19:32
Subject: Leger line widths for grace notes
Hi Daniel,
What is the spec's intent for the interpretation of legerLineExtension
("The amount by which a leger line whould extend either side of a
notehead") for grace or cue notes? Is it expected that this value would be
proportionally adjusted to reflect any scale factor applied to the note
heads? I didn't find any explicit language to that effect.
Using the same leger line extension value on grace notes as for normal
size notes, at least in some fonts, results in a somewhat weird looking
appearance with an oversize leger line.
. . . . . ...Joe
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH, Frankenstrasse 18b, D-20097 Hamburg, Germany
Phone: +49 (40) 21035-0 | Fax: +49 (40) 21035-300 | www.steinberg.net
President: Andreas Stelling | Managing Director: Thomas Schöpe, Hirofumi Osawa
Registration Court: Hamburg HRB 86534
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2017 22:09:49 UTC