Re: More MNX examples

>
>
> If more applications would output this level of MXML quality, I would be a
> very happy guy.
>

> In saying the foregoing, I don’t intend to cast stones toward the attempt
> to create MNX. I do want to point out, however, that our industry, as a
> whole, has yet to exploit fully what we already have with MXML.
>

Sure thing, George. We're trying to make it easier to define what "quality"
means in the encoding, so more developers can easily get it right and adopt
it.

...Joe