- From: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 17:16:15 -0400
- To: Andrew Hankinson <andrew.hankinson@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2017 21:16:48 UTC
Hi Andrew, On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Andrew Hankinson <andrew.hankinson@gmail.com > wrote: > Of course, complex non-standard Western music notations and semantic > musical structures are probably better suited to the flexibility that MEI > provides, so there is always that representational option as well. > I think you are comparing MEI with an approach that hasn't been worked out here yet. So the "of course" feels a bit hasty to me. I do in fact believe that MEI can represent these sorts of examples with some combination of its elements. The problem is, guaranteeing that applications will interpret those combinations in a way that reproduces the original. When flexibility applies to implementors as well as encoders, all bets are off. Do you have an encoding of Alex's example and an application that will render that encoding? (I don't, but I'm not making any claim that we have a solution to the problem yet :-) ...Joe
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2017 21:16:48 UTC