- From: James Ingram <j.ingram@netcologne.de>
- Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:20:45 +0200
- To: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz <bathory@maltedmedia.com>
- Message-ID: <9cd760e7-1282-7b03-a493-c8b49c725ccb@netcologne.de>
Hi Mogens, Dennis, I'm assuming that the MNX containers (<system>, <measure> etc.) are /abstract. /They contain objects that can have temporal and/or graphic parameters. @Mogens: I agree with you that ties can just be graphic. They don't need to contain temporal info. Neither do the <event> symbols to which they connect. All the temporal info can go in the first <event> to be tied. @Dennis: Note that nothing has been said about where on the page the <system>s, <measure>s etc. have to be. Usually, they nest in the way their names suggest for CWMN, but as long as they nest correctly, they can be read vertically or go round in circles as far as I care... :-) They might even overlap significantly, though that's an unusual case. /Where/ they exist on the page depends on the graphic definitions of the objects they contain, but the arrow of time always takes a predefined route. James Am 03.04.2017 um 13:42 schrieb mogens@lundholm.org: > > Since bars/measures are really graphic elements, I think there should > be no measures. Instead there should be a pure graphic symbol for a > bar/measure. With no measures, I think that also ties should fall. > /Tie/ is also just a graphic element and should be a pure graphic symbol. > > /Repeat/, /Segno/, /Coda/ and /Fine/ etc. seem to be related to > <measure>. For example /Segno /is always first in a measure, /Fine/ is > always last in measure. Will it just simplify > things being able to put them anywhere? > > /Mogens > -- https://github.com/notator http://james-ingram-act-two.de
Received on Monday, 3 April 2017 13:21:16 UTC