- From: Wil Macaulay <wil.macaulay@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:50:25 -0700
- To: Michael Good <mgood@makemusic.com>
- Cc: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPwTryJX-XCqjxu7PtREGPDiwnWA+VXVRRQadQPmvDMPMVcyoA@mail.gmail.com>
In my view, your proposal makes it easier to build global stylesheets. I'd like that. wil On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Michael Good <mgood@makemusic.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > Last Friday I was working on proposed solutions for many of the current > MusicXML 3.1 issues. You can see these proposals by looking at the In > Progress issues on GitHub at https://github.com/w3c/ > musicxml/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22In+Progress%22 > <https://github.com/w3c/musicxml/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:%22In+Progress%22> > . > > While working on issues 64 (SMuFL clefs), 71 (SMuFL rests), and 72 (SMuFL > octaves), I realized there were two different types of solutions available. > I would like to discuss this on the list here before adding the proposed > solutions to these 3 issues. > > These issues all involve distinguishing different glyphs that have the > same semantic meaning. In issue 64, for instance, there are at least 3 > different glyphs for representing the G clef transposed down an octave > (SMuFL glyphs gClef8vb, gClef8vbOld, gClef8vbCClef). In rest issue 71, > there are three different glyphs for quarter rests (restQuarter, > restQuarterOld, restQuarterZ). Similarly for the octave issue 72, there are > many different glyphs for representing different MusicXML octave-shift > values. > > I believe that in the large majority of cases, a single piece of music > uses just one of these glyphs as a matter of editorial style. If this is > true, we might best support these different glyphs in the MusicXML > appearance element. The appearance element is global to a MusicXML score. > > To do this we could add a new glyph element as a child element of the > appearance element. Like its sibling elements, it would have a type > attribute to indicate the type of glyph, and a text value for the actual > data - in this case, a SMuFL canonical glyph name. > > We would then document the standard glyph types and their associated SMuFL > values. However we would keep both the type attribute and the element > content as strings, not enumerations, so this could be extended as needed. > Some examples would be: > > - Type of "quarter-rest": Values include restQuarter, restQuarterOld, > restQuarterZ > - Type of "g-clef-ottava-bassa": Values include gClef8vb, gClef8vbOld, > gClef8vbCClef > - Type of "octave-shift-up-8": Values include ottava, ottavaBassa, > ottavaBassaBa, ottavaBassaVb, octaveBassa > > Other types that would be supported include c-clef, f-clef, > percussion-clef, octave-shift-down-8, octave-shift-down-15, > octave-shift-up-15, octave-shift-down-22, and octave-shift-up-22. > > Some additional work would still be done for these issue beyond this new > element. For the clef issue, we could add a new "semipitched" clef value to > handle semipitchedPercussionClef1 and semipitchedPercussionClef2. This > would support mixing semipitched and unpitched clefs within a single piece. > For the octave issue, we would also document the use of a size of 22 for > 3-octave shifts. > > The alternative solution would be to add new attributes and/or elements to > the child elements of the clef, note (either rest or type), and > octave-shift elements. That seems more complex, given the > interrelationships between the glyphs and the musical semantics. It seems > simpler to isolate the semantic combination for each glyph choice (e.g., a > sign of "G" and an octave-shift of "-1") within a new glyph element. > > What do you think? Does handling these glyphs in the appearance element > make sense? Or do you think we do need to handle each glyph in a score > individually? If there are examples of where different types of glyphs for > the same semantics are combined in a single musical score, could you please > reference them? Is there a different way to approach these issues than the > two solutions mentioned here? > > Thank you for your help on this! > > Best regards, > > Michael Good > VP of MusicXML Technologies > MakeMusic, Inc. > > -- The Craic app: http://thecraic.co abc tunes on the iPad and iPhone Sideband app: http://sideband.co slow down, loop and change the key. Learn by ear. Products and services: http://flagpig.com Twitter: @tom_frog
Received on Monday, 3 October 2016 17:50:54 UTC