Re: Introducing MNX

James,

You further clarified:

I'm worried that the Chair might be trying to limit the scope of this
> project to CWMN (as defined by MusicXML). That would be counter-productive
> and, as far as I'm concerned, defeat the whole purpose of creating a new
> standard.
>

Far from it. The entire point of the MNX container concept and multiple
"body types" is to avoid limiting this project to CWMN.

I do think it's appropriate that the initial round of work on MNX address
CWMN, to yield the greatest and most immediate benefits given the limited
resources available to the group. So there is an emphasis on looking at
CWMN first, but this does nothing to rule out other notational systems.

...Joe