- From: James Ingram <j.ingram@netcologne.de>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:10:51 +0200
- To: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org, Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
Hi all, I have very little experience with the inner workings of MusicXML, so I ought to stay out of any detailed discussions about turning it into a W3C standard. However, I do have a proposal which I think might help to future-proof it. Maybe this is already implemented. Maybe it can't be implemented. I really don't know. Proposal: MusicXML should allow durations to be defined simply as milliseconds. This would be an alternative to the tempo/beats/divisions timing model that comes from the 1981 MIDI standard. During the recent process of defining the Web MIDI API, they discovered that the tempo/beats/divisions model was redundant. So they dropped it in favour of just using milliseconds. Browsers have to be very economical with their code. And MIDI.org says > the Web-MIDI API is the most significant advancement of MIDI sinceā¦ > MIDI itself! Adopting this proposal would allow the authoring tools that use standard clefs, staves and chord symbols to migrate gracefully to the more flexible timing model -- and still be MusicXML compatible. Questions: Does MusicXML provide any support for MIDI Continuous Controllers? Can it? Should it? All the best, James
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2016 09:11:25 UTC