Re: SMuFL: Additional symbols

Daniel wrote:

> I have likewise chosen not to add the requests for the two Salzedo characters to the 'Multi-segment lines' range, since this seems like straightforward duplication, and therefore redundant.

One additional point about these: The glyphs in the Harp techniques range are different from the ones I requested in that they are not singular segments, and therefore will be less exact when repeated in a multi-segment context. If the already included glyphs are indeed intended to be used in a multi-segment line, I would suggest having only one single segment for each, even though this might make them less conspicuous as glyphs.

Knut