Re: SMuFL: Additional symbols

Yes, you're right on both accounts. 15 and 22 are already included in SMuFL. I suspect 16 and 24 was more generally used in France at the beginning of the 20th century, but I've only encountered them in Durand's scores.
If someone else knows more about the historical and geographical scope of this archaic way of labeling octaves, I would love to know.

Knut Nergaard
Thor Olsens gt. 6A
N-0177 OSLO
Tel: +47 984 85 750
Mail: knut.nergaard@gmail.com

> 19. okt. 2015 kl. 09.05 skrev Patrick Muchmore <pmuchmore@sarahlawrence.edu>:
> 
> Shouldn't two octaves be 15 instead of 16? And three octaves be 22? Or is that just Durand's own strange variant?
> 
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 11:56, Knut Nergaard <knut.nergaard@gmail.com <mailto:knut.nergaard@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>> I've been compiling a list of symbols that are lacking in SMuFL, but will be included in my own music font.
>> If there is any interest to include some of them in an upcoming version of SMuFL, here it is:
>> 
>> <New Glyphs.pdf>
>> 
>> 
>> Knut Nergaard
>> Thor Olsens gt. 6A
>> N-0177 OSLO
>> Tel: +47 984 85 750
>> Mail: knut.nergaard@gmail.com <mailto:knut.nergaard@gmail.com>