- From: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:53:48 -0500
- To: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CA+ojG-Y8UgmexE_NWBGyZQ3_ZQvNKd-Yu6w8avBG0MUa1FhYjA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, This is a very brief follow-up to Michael Good's post earlier today regarding the update to our agenda. I will now be working with the CG co-chairs and membership to document a set of use cases for MusicXML that cover both present and future. I expect to have an initial draft set of cases by the beginning of next week on the Wiki, to seed that discussion. It will be a "starter kit" to which much will be added. Let me say a bit more about what "use cases" mean to me. I'm talking about descriptions of things that someone would want to do with a notation format: effectively, a story about how it is (or could be) used. The use cases are about people and music: they are emphatically *not* about MusicXML itself. We will use these cases to help us understand where MusicXML is helpful, and where it is not. For that matter, we can use the very same cases to understand where MEI, IEEE 1599, and other formats are helpful, and where they are not. In effect, these cases are a lens to help us focus on where MusicXML should change, and to identify ideas from other standards efforts that can be applied. Here's a small example use case: "Performer wants to view only her own music from a larger ensemble score, optimized for her personal performance." We are trying to state a problem in a human/musical context. As a counterexample, we'll want to stay away from concrete proposals like, "Allow the <part> element to have new child elements describing the full-score format and individual-part format.". That's a possible solution, not a problem. Up front, also, let me say that use cases are not just about the present. They are about the future things we all would like to do with notation formats. But the future cannot be unlimited, and a standard needs to be standardized. I hope it's obvious that we will not be able to address every proposed use case in this group, which would result in our accomplishing very little. Along with the development of use cases, an understanding on the scoping of this effort must emerge. However, I think there's great value in soliciting lots of use cases up front and filtering them later on. For now, I have a temporary request: please let's not all jump in and contribute our favorite use cases just yet (of course, many of you already have, in effect, and we'll want to farm the posts that have already occurred). I know there is a lot of pent up desire to get this going. We just need to get a head start on setting up a good framework and a good direction, and it will not take long. I'm excited about this. Best, . . . . . ...Joe *Joe Berkovitz* President *Noteflight LLC* 49R Day Street / Somerville, MA 02144 / USA phone: +1 978 314 6271 www.noteflight.com "Your music, everywhere"
Received on Monday, 9 November 2015 22:54:19 UTC