Hi Serge,
just to let you know that ITS 2.0 got through - thanks for continuing to
look at this. More info and the publication will come later this week.
- Felix
Am 24.10.13 22:49, schrieb Serge Gladkoff:
>
> Hi,
>
> I checked the first option: "support publication as a REC"
>
> Regards,
>
> Serge
>
> *From:*Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:07 PM
> *To:* Dr. David Filip
> *Cc:* Serge Gladkoff; Des Oates; Ankit Srivastava; John Judge;
> Nicoletta Calzolari; oreste.signore@isti.cnr.it; Clemens Weins; Yves
> Savourel; Georg Rehm; Tadej ©tajner; "Pedro L. Díez Orzas"; Serge
> Gladkoff; Daniel Grasmick; Jan Nelson; Milan Karasek; Lieske,
> Christian; dave lewis; Jirka Kosek; Phil Ritchie;
> public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: Moving ITS 2.0 forward - your action needed by 21
> October latest
>
> Am 24.10.13 13:25, schrieb Dr. David Filip:
>
> Felix, Serge,
>
> Not sure if I understand Serge properly, but did he not say that
> he inadvertently filed a formal objection?
>
>
> No, I checked (the check page is W3C staff confidential) his vote and
> it was no formal objection - but just saying "support publication as a
> REC".
>
>
>
> Is there a way to verify what kind of vote Serge actually did cast? Is
> there a URL where members can see the results of the ballot?
>
>
> Sorry, I can't share them with you, they are only avail. to the staff.
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>
>
> Thanks
>
> dF
>
>
> Dr. David Filip
>
> =======================
>
> LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
>
> University of Limerick, Ireland
>
> telephone: +353-6120-2781
>
> *cellphone: +353-86-0222-158*
>
> facsimile: +353-6120-2734
>
> mailto: david.filip@ul.ie <mailto:david.filip@ul.ie>
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org
> <mailto:fsasaki@w3.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi Serge,
>
> no worries about this, I think this should be ok - otherwise I'll come
> back to you. Thanks for the follow up and sorry for disturbing you
> during travel.
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>
> Am 24.10.13 01:19, schrieb Serge Gladkoff:
>
> Dear Felix,
>
> I was travelling this and the previous weeks extensively with
> occasional WiFi access from public locations, and I cast Logrus
> vote in a hurry choosing the option which is not quite correct.
>
> I would like to fix it, if at all possible.
>
> Specifically, in question 6, I should have been choosing "suggests
> changes, but supports publication as a W3C Recommendation whether
> or not the changes are adopted (your details below)."
>
> In explanation I wanted actually to note that: "We need to
> publish, but make changes, since an inconsistency was found
> between the schema and the specification about the values allowed
> for the lineBreakType attribute. In Logrus opinion, the fix in the
> schema is only an editorial change. The list of allowed values for
> that attribute has been discussed and set a while back. The change
> does not affect implementations. In addition, we suggest to make
> the schema non-normative to avoid issues like the above in the
> future. This also will not influence implementations since the
> schema is not referenced normatively from the section of conformance."
>
> Would it still be possible to change Logrus vote on this -- it's
> minor change, I guess.
>
> Regards,
>
> Serge Gladkoff
>
> Logrus LLC
>
> *From:*Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> *Sent:* Monday, October 14, 2013 7:32 AM
> *To:* Des Oates; Ankit Srivastava; John Judge; Nicoletta
> Calzolari; oreste.signore@isti.cnr.it
> <mailto:oreste.signore@isti.cnr.it>; Clemens Weins; Yves Savourel;
> Georg Rehm; tadej.stajner@ijs.si <mailto:tadej.stajner@ijs.si>;
> "Pedro L. Díez Orzas"; Serge Gladkoff; Daniel Grasmick; Jan
> Nelson; Milan Karasek; Lieske, Christian; dave lewis; Jirka Kosek;
> Dr. David Filip; Phil Ritchie; Lieske, Christian
> *Cc:* public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> <mailto:public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Moving ITS 2.0 forward - your action needed by 21
> October latest
>
> Dear ITS 2.0 supporters,
>
> I had mentioned that we can move ITS 2.0 to PR, and your help
> would be very helpful.
>
> For organizations that do not implement ITS 2.0 but having your AC
> rep filling in this form
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/ITS20PR2013/
> by *21 October* would be great. NOTE: this is a hard deadline, but
> filling in the form will take only 5 minutes.
>
> For the implementers (for the others this is optional): it is
> important that you state the following in the form:
> - in question 6, choose "suggests changes, but supports
> publication as a W3C Recommendation whether or not the changes are
> adopted (your details below)."
> - as an explanation say something like:
> "An inconsistency was found between the schema and the
> specification about the values allowed for the lineBreakType
> attribute.
> In our opinion, the fix in the schema is only an editorial change.
> The list of allowed values for that attribute has been discussed
> and set a while back. The change does not affect implementations.
> In addition, we suggest to make the schema non-normative to avoid
> issues like the above in the future. This also will not influence
> implementations since the schema is not referenced normatively
> from the conformance section"
>
> Above is taken from an existing AC review and adapted - if needed
> please re-do the review by filling in the form again.
>
> Doing the above is quite important to express that our group is
> definitely OK with the change.
>
> Thanks again for all the support,
>
> Felix
>