Hi Serge,
no worries about this, I think this should be ok - otherwise I'll come
back to you. Thanks for the follow up and sorry for disturbing you
during travel.
Best,
Felix
Am 24.10.13 01:19, schrieb Serge Gladkoff:
>
> Dear Felix,
>
> I was travelling this and the previous weeks extensively with
> occasional WiFi access from public locations, and I cast Logrus vote
> in a hurry choosing the option which is not quite correct.
>
> I would like to fix it, if at all possible.
>
> Specifically, in question 6, I should have been choosing "suggests
> changes, but supports publication as a W3C Recommendation whether or
> not the changes are adopted (your details below)."
>
> In explanation I wanted actually to note that: "We need to publish,
> but make changes, since an inconsistency was found between the schema
> and the specification about the values allowed for the lineBreakType
> attribute. In Logrus opinion, the fix in the schema is only an
> editorial change. The list of allowed values for that attribute has
> been discussed and set a while back. The change does not affect
> implementations. In addition, we suggest to make the schema
> non-normative to avoid issues like the above in the future. This also
> will not influence implementations since the schema is not referenced
> normatively from the section of conformance."
>
> Would it still be possible to change Logrus vote on this -- it's minor
> change, I guess.
>
> Regards,
>
> Serge Gladkoff
>
> Logrus LLC
>
> *From:*Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> *Sent:* Monday, October 14, 2013 7:32 AM
> *To:* Des Oates; Ankit Srivastava; John Judge; Nicoletta Calzolari;
> oreste.signore@isti.cnr.it; Clemens Weins; Yves Savourel; Georg Rehm;
> tadej.stajner@ijs.si; "Pedro L. Díez Orzas"; Serge Gladkoff; Daniel
> Grasmick; Jan Nelson; Milan Karasek; Lieske, Christian; dave lewis;
> Jirka Kosek; Dr. David Filip; Phil Ritchie; Lieske, Christian
> *Cc:* public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> *Subject:* Moving ITS 2.0 forward - your action needed by 21 October
> latest
>
> Dear ITS 2.0 supporters,
>
> I had mentioned that we can move ITS 2.0 to PR, and your help would be
> very helpful.
>
> For organizations that do not implement ITS 2.0 but having your AC rep
> filling in this form
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/ITS20PR2013/
> by *21 October* would be great. NOTE: this is a hard deadline, but
> filling in the form will take only 5 minutes.
>
> For the implementers (for the others this is optional): it is
> important that you state the following in the form:
> - in question 6, choose "suggests changes, but supports publication as
> a W3C Recommendation whether or not the changes are adopted (your
> details below)."
> - as an explanation say something like:
> "An inconsistency was found between the schema and the specification
> about the values allowed for the lineBreakType attribute.
> In our opinion, the fix in the schema is only an editorial change.
> The list of allowed values for that attribute has been discussed and
> set a while back. The change does not affect implementations. In
> addition, we suggest to make the schema non-normative to avoid issues
> like the above in the future. This also will not influence
> implementations since the schema is not referenced normatively from
> the conformance section"
>
> Above is taken from an existing AC review and adapted - if needed
> please re-do the review by filling in the form again.
>
> Doing the above is quite important to express that our group is
> definitely OK with the change.
>
> Thanks again for all the support,
>
> Felix
>