Re: [Updated agenda including new issue] MLW-LT call 26 July noon UTC

On 26.6.2013 13:42, Felix Sasaki wrote:

> I had proposed an edit here
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jun/0103.html
> 
> which one would you prefer? My edit would not be specific about a "rule"
> element: if there are naming conflicts between "param" eleemnts because
> of linked rules, they can be resolved too.

Sorry, I have missed it. I'm fine with your proposal. Difference is that
your scope params globaly possibly over all rule elements, where as I
think that our current definition scopes parameters localy only to
<rule> element where they have been provided.

Practically this is not big issues as they are meant to be externally
overwritten so they would behave as global anyway.

So I think that we can go with your proposal as is already implemented.

    Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bringing you XML Prague conference    http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------