RE: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang)

Hi all,

> Yves is right about HTML5 content and that the don't cover XHTML

We actually have a section for XHTML too (I missed that when looking at xml:lang).

> If the Test Suite will have XHTML examples, then maybe these 
> should be put under a new format - xhtml (in the same level as xml and html)?

It probably make sense since it is a different format.
But who will support it? Initially the WG asked for implementation commitments for XML and HTML5 not XHTML.


Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 15:59:48 UTC