- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:41:30 +0100
- To: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <512BA24A.7020700@w3.org>
Hi all,
minutes are at
http://www.w3.org/2013/02/25-mlw-lt-minutes.html
and below as text. Two important action items:
- please fill in the doodle poll for Luxembourg, see
http://www.doodle.com/2uizhdqmbmw6qwa9
- HTML implementers: have a look at
http://www.w3.org/2013/02/25-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item04
and the discussion on defaults for HTML. The default implementation
proposal at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0235.html
may put some burden on implementers, see e.g.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0243.html
before moving this forward we need to be sure that this is feasible. We
will discuss the topic again on Wednesday.
Best,
Felix
- Felix
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
MLW-LT WG
25 Feb 2013
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0241.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2013/02/25-mlw-lt-irc
Attendees
Present
joerg, felix, kfritsche, Ankit, Des, Pedro, omstefanov,
Jirka, Yves, shaunm, Marcis, pnietoca, leroy, mdelolmo,
Giuseppe, Milan, tadej, davelewis
Regrets
christian, clemens, dom
Chair
felix
Scribe
shaunm
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]agenda
2. [6]High level usage scenario doc publication
3. [7]HTML ITS default behaviour
4. [8]https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt
/track/issues/68
5. [9]Conformance type
6. [10]XLIFF mapping
7. [11]Unicode normalization / NIF comments , ITS
Ontology
8. [12]AOB / Rome / Luxembourg prep
* [13]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
agenda
<fsasaki>
[14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt/2013Feb/0241.html
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0241.html
High level usage scenario doc publication
<fsasaki>
[15]http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Use
_cases_-_high_level_summary
[15] http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary
<fsasaki> - having Christian editing the doc until next Monday
- vote for publication 6 March call - publication 8 March
<fsasaki> next monday = 4 march
fsasaki: publishing march 8. last date before the workshop
... Please go through your use cases
HTML ITS default behaviour
Yves_: there is discrepancy in behavior between different data
categories in HTML
... when an author marks up a document because of different
behavior in different tools
... we don't specify things like the <b> element should be
withinText
<fsasaki> ITS 1.0 global rules are at
[16]http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-i18n-bp/#relating-its-plus-xhtml
[16] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-i18n-bp/#relating-its-plus-xhtml
Yves_: we could have a set of global rules for HTML that
implementors must use
... if you don't implement global rules, this won't work.
instead have default attributes
<fsasaki> default implementation proposal at
[17]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt/2013Feb/0235.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0235.html
Yves_: implementation of such defaults is probably difficult
<fsasaki>
[18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt/2013Feb/0243.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0243.html
Yves_: implementation is not a problem for okapi
<fsasaki>
[19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt/2013Feb/0205.html
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0205.html
pnietoca: some MT systems hardcode translation of some
attributes
<fsasaki>
[20]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21085
[20] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21085
Yves_: currently html translate affects attribute and
its:translate does not
<fsasaki>
[21]http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20121206/#datacategories
-defaults-etc
[21] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20121206/#datacategories-defaults-etc
kfritsche: in our implementation, we use non HTML specific
defaults from the ITS spec, sec. 8.1
<Marcis> Will there be a list of defaults somewhere specified?
We are currently adding Elements Within Text rules within HTML
documents...
pnietoca: we use global rules for translate, for instance.
... if some people don't use it, you have to hardcode which
attributes to translate
kfritsche: is this the proposal to change the default values in
table 8.1?
Yves_: proposal is to have in the html specification
information on defaults
fsasaki: or we could provide a global rules file
... I was proposing the defaults for people only doing its
locally
Yves_: there's a discrepancy between defaults and global rules
because of overriding
... people who don't implement ITS globally just have to make
sure the behavior with defaults matches what it would be with
default values
<fsasaki> shaun: issue of not knowing what you are overriding
with local attributes - that is an issue with any format right?
<fsasaki> yves: yes
<fsasaki> shaun: who are the implementers who don't do global
rules?
<fsasaki>
[22]http://htmlpreview.github.com/?https://raw.github.com/finnl
e/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/master/its2.0/testSuiteDashboard.html
[22] http://htmlpreview.github.com/?https://raw.github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/master/its2.0/testSuiteDashboard.html
<fsasaki> it seems everybody of the implementers currently on
the table, do global rules
<fsasaki> karl: new implementers might do local markup only -
we should be aware of that
<fsasaki> shaun: there is no implementation difficulty for me
either way
fsasaki: propose not to close this issue too fast
... other people not on the call might have different opinions
Yves_: implementors could look at their implementations to see
how difficult defaults versus global rules is
fsasaki: give implementors time, come back to issue next
wednesday
<daveL> apologies for joining late
[23]https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/
68
[23] https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/68
<fsasaki> see draft + example files here
[24]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt/2013Feb/0221.html
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0221.html
tadej: no major contents changes. sent a draft to the mailing
list
... we are dropping granularity levels, renaming to text
analysis, clarified some
<fsasaki> ACTION: christian to edit issue-68 proposal at
[25]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt/2013Feb/0221.html into the its2 draft [recorded in
[26]http://www.w3.org/2013/02/25-mlw-lt-minutes.html#action01]
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0221.html
<trackbot> Created ACTION-451 - Edit issue-68 proposal at
[27]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt/2013Feb/0221.html into the its2 draft [on Christian Lieske -
due 2013-03-04].
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0221.html
<fsasaki>
[28]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt/2013Feb/att-0221/ta-examples-20130222.zip
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/att-0221/ta-examples-20130222.zip
omstefanov: all the file names in the test suite still refer to
disambiguation
tadej: should we rename all the files?
leroy: yes, and move to directories named for the category
Conformance type
<fsasaki>
[29]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt-comments/2013Feb/0048.html
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0048.html
fsasaki: needs input from Phil. Phil not present today
XLIFF mapping
daveL: xliff round-trip examples for rome help use work through
some issues
... we need separate discussions on how best to present that as
best practices. don't spend time on that now. maybe in rome
Yves_: while discussing terminology, we realized when you tag
something in xliff, we don't have a way to mark it up with ITS
in the original document
<Marcis> A question: if we add mark-up to XLIFF, should we use
the mrk or its:span annotation?
daveL: in XLIFF we can add things after authoring time; don't
have local markup for these in ITS
<Yves_> to marcis: <mrk> (you can't have <its:span> in XLIFF)
Yves_: you can add ITS attributes to <mrk>. some are redundant
with XLIFF attributes
<fsasaki>
[30]http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/XLI
FF_Mapping
[30] http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/XLIFF_Mapping
daveL: three use cases: mapping from source format to XLIFF,
mapping from XLIFF to target format, marking up XLIFF to be
consumed in XLIFF in another process
... ideally have the same markup in all those cases, but might
not be possible
Unicode normalization / NIF comments , ITS Ontology
<fsasaki>
[31]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt-comments/2013Feb/0050.html
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0050.html
fsasaki: don't require normalization in other technologies.
propose to close issue
<fsasaki>
[32]https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/i
ssues/119
[32] https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/119
<fsasaki>
[33]http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/ITS
-RDF_mapping#Ontology_.28DRAFT.29
[33] http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/ITS-RDF_mapping#Ontology_.28DRAFT.29
daveL: expanded that out of example in NIF
... took a Relax NG schema and went through data categories to
see which could be used in RDF and NIF
... appreciate feedback
... haven't figured out what we need to do with annotators ref.
works out in provenance setting, but maybe not NIF
... problems where we've introduced idea that order has
temporal relationship
AOB / Rome / Luxembourg prep
<fsasaki> [34]http://www.doodle.com/2uizhdqmbmw6qwa9
[34] http://www.doodle.com/2uizhdqmbmw6qwa9
fsasaki: have a call to prepare for rome meeting. please fill
in doodle poll
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: christian to edit issue-68 proposal at
[35]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt/2013Feb/0221.html into the its2 draft [recorded in
[36]http://www.w3.org/2013/02/25-mlw-lt-minutes.html#action01]
[35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0221.html
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [37]scribe.perl version
1.137 ([38]CVS log)
$Date: 2013-02-25 17:36:45 $
[37] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[38] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 17:42:01 UTC