- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:42:37 -0700
- To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
>>> <span its-within-text="no"><span> ...</span></span> the inner span >>> would be overriden by the <its:withinTextRule withinText="yes" >>> selector="//h:abbr | //h:acronym | //h:br | //h:cite | //h:code | //h:dfn >>> | //h:kbd | //h:q | //h:samp | //h:span | //h:strong | //h:var | //h:b | //h:em >>> | //h:big | //h:hr | //h:i | //h:small | //h:sub | //h:sup | //h:tt | //h:del >>> | //h:ins | //h:bdo | //h:img | //h:a | //h:font | //h:center | //h:s | //h:strike >>> | //h:u | //h:isindex" /> >>> Taken from >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-i18n-bp/#relating-its-plus-xhtml >> Mmm... You mean the reverse: The local its-within-text="no" markup would override the global (default) rules, right? > > Actually: no. In my example there is a span nexted in the span with local > its-within-text="no". Global rules have higher precedence than inherited > values. So I thought that the nested span would be nested="yes". Oh, I completely missed the inner <span>. Yes you are right: that one would be its-within-text='yes' based on the rules. And since it is set by the rules it can 'inherit' within-text='no' from its parent <span>. we agree. -ys
Received on Friday, 22 February 2013 16:45:24 UTC