- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:53:03 -0700
- To: "'Multilingual Web LT Public List Public List'" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
For this one: > - If we just put the result of termInfoPointer, termInfoRef and termInfoRefPointer > in comment and let the user deal with URI vs text: how can that be processed by an > ITS-only tool? You cannot have a global rule like this: > <its:termRule selector="//mrk[@mtype='term']" term='yes' > termInfoPointer="@comment" termInfoRefPointer="@comment"/> The comment attribute can be either but not both. How about we use comment for text (i.e. from termInfoPointer) and its:termInfoRef for URI (i.e. from termInfoRef or termInforefPointer)? That way there is a clear distinction between the two types of information. that still doesn't solve mapping the text info back into the original document, but it's a small progress. -ys
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 13:53:43 UTC