W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [All] ITS 2.0 = The "Dublin Core" of the Multilingual Web?

From: Arle Lommel <arle.lommel@dfki.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:51:09 +0100
Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Message-Id: <EC247713-011E-4E05-90AC-DAE7F353FC98@dfki.de>
To: David Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
Dave, is the issue with the border that they can't do full bleed (i.e., borderless) printing or something else?


On 2013 Feb 19, at 08:37 , David Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:

> Hi felix,
> Yes, that is inspired thinking, this is a great idea! Like dublin core, its agnostic of the content format in which it is used and as you say it addresses a whole range of related applications. 
> This characterisation of its2.0 also has the potential to catch more of the interest of the content management and the (non-linguistic) linked data communities where dc is already familiar currency.
> Yesterday in the call we were discussing the need to rework the poster template, since many people are having trouble with the border, plus i think we need to have some fp7/eu logos on the bottom. At the same time then perhaps we could replace the location and dat info at the bottom with ITS 2.0 = The "Dublin Core" of the Multilingual Web?
> I know arle is busy with rome prep, so we could have a go at revamping the template today at tcd.
> Cheers,
> Dave
> On 18 Feb 2013, at 20:41, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> would you agree with the statement made in the subject of this mail?
>> I'm asking since like Dublin Core metadata
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin_Core
>> ITS 2.0
>> - provides a relatively small set of metadata items
>> - separates between concepts and various syntaxes (HTML(5), XML) to write these
>> - metadata covers a broad range of applications
>> I'm asking for two reasons:
>> - with the "high level summary" we want to publish at http://www.w3.org/TR/mlw-metadata-us-impl
>> would above phrase be something for the introduction?
>> - with the reporting for our underlying EU project in mind - would above phrase help to make the role of ITS 2.0 clear?
>> Thanks for any feedback in advance,
>> Felix

Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 07:51:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:32:04 UTC