- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:33:30 +0200
- To: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <521E265A.8010400@w3.org>
Hi all, to leave the third last call period, we need to resolve our two issues (or others that might come up until 10 September - end of the last call): mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-131: "URI scheme used in NIF conversion" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Aug/0058.html mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-132: Clarifications in "8.16 Localization Quality Issue" and appendix "C Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type" [MLW-LT Standard Draft] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Aug/0059.html *Please do *not* reply to this mail. *Please reply to the two mails cited above to state your opinions on the issues. For mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-131: "URI scheme used in NIF conversion" we have three options: - register an URI scheme for the output of the NIF conversion - use URIs with the character offest in the query part - do nothing For mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-132: LQI clarifications, we have edits that Arle will send out shortly. These got input from Yves and I and partially (in a previou version) also from Christian and Phil. Please look out for Arle's mail (it will come today or tomorrow) and reply to it with comments on the edits. Deadline for both would be 5 September - see also http://www.w3.org/2013/08/28-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item04 At the 4 September WG call, we want to express a "working group" response to the RDF WG - so please make your opinion explicit via mail and / or on the call. Even if you are not implementing the NIF conversion, think about the consequences of three options time wise. Having an explicit record of the WGs statement is important for the transition. Best, Felix
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 16:34:00 UTC