Re: Re-sending: Request for review from the RDF working group: ITS 2.0

Thanks a lot, Guus. This is actually good timing: today we will publish 
a new last call draft. The reason for having a last call again is that 
we have defined NIF (= our approach to represent ITS2 in RDF) as a 
non-normative feature. So your feedback on this mechanism is very much 
appreciated. The new LC draft is already in place at

http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-its20-20130820/

Best,

Felix

Am 20.08.13 15:29, schrieb Guus Schreiber:
> Felix,
>
> Sorry for the delay in responding. This is to let you know that this 
> topic is on the agenda for tomorrow's RDF-WG telecon [1]. I should add 
> that we are in a critical phase with not too many active WG members, 
> but I still hope we will be able to provide feedback.
>
> Best,
> Guus
>
> [1] 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.08.21#Request_for_Review:_ITS_2.0 
>
>
> On 01-08-13 14:17, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>> (Apologies for re-sending, I wasn't subscribed to the RDF WG list)
>>
>> Dear RDF Working Group (sending this also explicitly to Guus, David and
>> Sandro as co-chairs / staff contact, to raise their awareness), with CC
>> to the MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group,
>>
>> with this mail I am asking the RDF Working Group to review the ITS 2.0
>> draft at [1]. The latest draft under TR space is a last call draft [2].
>> A diff between the two drafts is here [3]. Note that during last call we
>> did a lot of changes to the informative sections 1-2 (which are not
>> relevant for the normative definition of ITS 2.0).
>>
>> ITS 2.0 provides metadata items ("data categories") to foster the
>> (automated) creation and processing of multilingual Web content: mostly
>> HTML and XML. What may be of special interest for you is the ITS 2.0
>> approach to convert markup documents into RDF. This results in triples
>> that make use of the NIF ontology [4]. See the definition of the NIF
>> conversion algorithm at [5] and tests (= examples) from our test suite
>> in the implementation report [6]. Of course a general review from the
>> RDF WG would be nice, but I assume that this feature of ITS 2.0 is of
>> most interest for you.
>>
>> Our last call period already ended 11 June, and my apologies for being
>> late with this request. If you need more info to move this forward
>> please let me know.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Felix Sasaki (co-chair and staff contact for the MultilingualWeb-LT
>> Working Group)
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html 
>>
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-its20-20130521/
>> [3] http://tinyurl.com/k4duo76
>> [4] http://persistence.uni-leipzig.org/nlp2rdf/
>> [5]
>> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#conversion-to-nif 
>>
>>
>> [6]
>> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20-implementation-report.html#conformance-nif-conversion 
>>
>>

Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2013 13:34:06 UTC