Re: Votes about ITS RDF representation http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Aug/0010.html

Felix

You have not listed my vote for 1.

Phil.





From:   Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
To:     "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" 
<public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, 
Date:   14/08/2013 12:41
Subject:        Votes about ITS RDF representation 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Aug/0010.html



Hi all,

as an input to our call, here are the opinions about the ITS RDF 
representation question gathered so far. NOTE: I didn't asked for types 
of votes (pro, can live with, cannot live with, ...). So below is my 
interpretation of mails. Let's confirm this on the call. If the 
attendance on the call is low (thank you August holidays :) ) we may 
need to take a few more days via mail to gather additional votes.

Talk to you soon,

Felix

1) Have a non-normative reference to NIF
Pro: Dave, Felix, Tadej, Karl
Can live with: David, Jörg
Cannot live with this: -

2a) Intent to have a standardized, that is normative RDF representation 
of ITS2. This could then not be NIF. It could be 2a) something based on 
NIF, e.g. moving the six URIs that we rely on (+ the ontology file?)
Pro: David, Jörg
Can live with this: -
Cannot live with this: Dave, Felix, Tadej

2b) something completely different, yet to be defined.
Pro: -
Can live with this: Jörg
Cannot live with this: Felix, Dave, David


************************************************************
VistaTEC Ltd. Registered in Ireland 268483. 
Registered Office, VistaTEC House, 700, South Circular Road, 
Kilmainham. Dublin 8. Ireland. 

The information contained in this message, including any accompanying 
documents, is confidential and is intended only for the addressee(s). 
The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, or alteration of this 
message is strictly forbidden. If you have received this message in
error please notify the sender immediately.
************************************************************