[ACTION-336] Re: [All] plan for Thursday

Hi all,
In reviewing terminology data category  yesterday two points came up:

1)  It was questioned where we did we actually get concensus to include 
confidence score in terminology. In response to:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0101.html

Marcis responded in the affirmative in:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0104.html
Yves just reported he implements it also. So that seems settled now in 
the affirmative.

2) We also don't currently support term confidence for global rules. It 
could be useful here if we used a non-pointer rule, i.e. for 
termInfoRef, in a global rule for a specific attribute value text (which 
is the motivation for global rules in mtConfidence, see example 84.)

Do any of the implementers of terminology think we need to add this?

If so please respond by close of business Friday this week, otherwise we 
leave this as it is in the spec currently, without confidence for global 
rules.

cheers,
Dave




On 28/11/2012 19:57, Felix Sasaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> if we continue with the current, pace, I think on Thursday we will be 
> able to have a stable draft for the normative sections.
>
> TBD (feel free to add):
>
> 1) Go through sec. 8.13 - 8.21
> 2) make example updates discussed today on the list and as captuared 
> in various action items 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/
> 3) action items, esp.
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/336
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/339
>
> I'd be happy to have another editing call 2-5 p.m. utc. I think at 
> least Jirka said he would have time, and Dave for one hour. Everybody, 
> let's meet on IRC.
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>