- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:19:24 +0100
- To: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>
- Cc: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAL58czpVL0Aa+wdyQmCm1R9K3M9s=H8J=npe0irJ_XO+SBpwmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the comment, Phil. Actually the story is a bit different. "Normative" means: this is a part of the document that defines the standard. Implementors have to read this to create implementations. If the document defines conformance clauses that allow for sub-parts to be implemented, when implementors can say "we will implement the following parts: ...". Example, based on the conformance clauses at http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#conformance-product-processing-expectations An implementation can say "I implement ITS 1.0, the 'Translate' data category, locally, that is a 'translate' attribute in XML content". "Informative" means: this part does not contain text defining the standard. It contains only explanatory material. To give another example of the difference: at http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#basic-concepts-selection there is an informative section describing what "selection" means in ITS 1.0. At http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#datacategory-locations there is the normative definition of "selection". The latter text is harder to read for users, but contains the details for implementors. One further difference between "normative" and "informative" is that normally only in "normative" text you find RFC 2119 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt keywords like MUST, MUST NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT. So, what does this mean for http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/MetadataStandardDraft Mainly: The "best practices" section will not contain something for implementors of the standard, only explanatory material. Hope that helps - if not let me know, Felix Am 21. März 2012 21:01 schrieb Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>: > Felix > > I think part of the clarification (for the standards-newbies) was that > "Normative" is required whilst "Informative" is recommended/optional. > > Phil > > > > On 21 Mar 2012, at 18:43, "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I had an action item related to normative and informative sections of the > "standard" draft. I tried to implement this very simple at > > > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/MetadataStandardDraft > > Adding the statement "This section is informative" to the Introduction and > to a "Best Practices" section, and "This section is normative" to the "Data > categories" section. Comments welcome. > > Best, > > Felix > > -- > Felix Sasaki > DFKI / W3C Fellow > > > ************************************************************ > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the sender immediately by e-mail. > > www.vistatec.com > ************************************************************ > -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2012 20:19:51 UTC