On 20.3.2012 14:33, Felix Sasaki wrote:
> Am 20. März 2012 13:39 schrieb Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@inria.fr
I haven't received Maxime email, nor I see it in archive, anyway:
>> I believe that:
>> - porting the ITS to the Semantic Web formalisms would be the best
>> practise to represent hierarchical concepts and thus to enable simple
>> reasoning,
It's nice to believe, but do we need hierarchical concepts for ITS and
future ITS 2.0 metadata? Do we need reasoning for ITS? I can hardly
imagine -- we just need bunch metadata which will be roundtripped
between editors, translation software, CMS, ...
>> - using RDFa in HTML5 would leverage the interoperability between
>> existing/futur w3c standards (correct validation, easy data consumability
>> by browser extensions, enhanced search engine results goo.gl/aCb2P
>> , etc.)
In theory. In practise please show us how to express this in RDFa:
<p its:locNote="foo">bar</p>
In other words -- there is element p in document and locNote annotation
with value "foo" is attached to this element.
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 14:16:13 UTC