Saturday, 30 June 2012
Friday, 29 June 2012
- Re: [ACTION-135] specialRequirements flesh out
- [ACTION-135] specialRequirements flesh out
- Re: [All] domain data category section proposal, please review
Thursday, 28 June 2012
- ACTION-143 text proposal for local elements within text
- [All] tracking data category progress
- MLW-LT WG call minutes 2012-06-28
- gotomeeting info
- Can't make today's Conf call
- Re: [ACTION-120] Jirka to make a clarification in the req draft about previous versions of HTML
- [All] call for a scribe for today
- [ISSUE-22] Provenance and agents
- Re: Terminology merging ? (Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday)
- [All updated agenda] Re: [All] AGENDA MLW-LT Call 28 June, 2 p.m. UTC
Wednesday, 27 June 2012
- Re: Terminology merging ? (Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday)
- [ISSUE-3] Call for consensus on "ontology for metadata values in namedEntity"
- [ISSUE 12] Segmentation Markup System
Tuesday, 26 June 2012
- Re: BCP 47 "t" extension follow up and locale identifier definition
- Re: [All] domain data category section proposal, please review
- [All] AGENDA MLW-LT Call 28 June, 2 p.m. UTC
- Re: [All] domain data category section proposal, please review
- Re: Query on ISO-Cat/DCR
- Re: Query on ISO-Cat/DCR
- Re: Query on ISO-Cat/DCR
- Re: BCP 47 "t" extension follow up and locale identifier definition
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
Monday, 25 June 2012
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
- Re: [All] domain data category section proposal, please review
- Re: Query on ISO-Cat/DCR
- Re: [All] domain data category section proposal, please review
- RE: [All] domain data category section proposal, please review
- BCP 47 "t" extension follow up and locale identifier definition
- Re: [ACTION-120] Jirka to make a clarification in the req draft about previous versions of HTML
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-32 (ruby-model): Ruby model [MLW-LT Standard Draft]
- Re: [ISSUE-6] Re: [ACTION-123]
- Re: Terminology merging ? (Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday)
- Re: Query on ISO-Cat/DCR
- [All] domain data category section proposal, please review
- [All] ITS 2.0: next steps by 15 July and for September f2f meeting
- Query on ISO-Cat/DCR
Sunday, 24 June 2012
Friday, 22 June 2012
Saturday, 23 June 2012
Friday, 22 June 2012
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-30 (Maxime): yes and no, true and false ... [MLW-LT Standard Draft]
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: [all] Call for FEISGILTT 2012 Program Committee Participation
- RE: [all] Call for FEISGILTT 2012 Program Committee Participation
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-30 (Maxime): yes and no, true and false ... [MLW-LT Standard Draft]
- [ACTION-123]
- RE: MultilingualWeb-LT working group: question about CURIEs and their use outside RDFa.
- Re: MultilingualWeb-LT working group: question about CURIEs and their use outside RDFa.
- [ACTION-120] Jirka to make a clarification in the req draft about previous versions of HTML
- [ACTION-121] Jirka to summarize usage of Ruby in DocBook
- Re: MultilingualWeb-LT working group: question about CURIEs and their use outside RDFa.
- Re: MultilingualWeb-LT working group: question about CURIEs and their use outside RDFa.
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
Thursday, 21 June 2012
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
- [all] Call for FEISGILTT 2012 Program Committee Participation
- Re: [all] AGENDA MLW-LT WG, 21st June 2012, 2pm UTC
- Re: [all] AGENDA MLW-LT WG, 21st June 2012, 2pm UTC
- RE: regrets for telco
- regrets for telco
- Re: [all] AGENDA MLW-LT WG, 21st June 2012, 2pm UTC
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
- MultilingualWeb-LT working group: question about CURIEs and their use outside RDFa.
- Re: [all] AGENDA MLW-LT WG, 21st June 2012, 2pm UTC
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-28 (Maxime): What are the type of node that may be selected in global rules ?
- Re: Terminology merging ? (Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday)
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Terminology merging ? (Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday)
- [all] AGENDA MLW-LT WG, 21st June 2012, 2pm UTC
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-28 (Maxime): What are the type of node that may be selected in global rules ?
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-28 (Maxime): What are the type of node that may be selected in global rules ?
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
- AW: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- AW: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: ISSUE 16: parameters for rules
- Re: ISSUE-27: Local withinText implementation
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
Monday, 18 June 2012
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: ISSUE 16: parameters for rules
- Re: Note on its:term [ISSUE-24]
- Re: Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
- Re: Note on its:term [ISSUE-24]
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
- [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
Saturday, 16 June 2012
- RE: ISSUE 16: parameters for rules
- Re: Note on its:term
- Re: Some input from EDI-TA (posteding methodology research)
- Re: ISSUE 16: parameters for rules
- Re: ISSUE-27: Local withinText implementation
Friday, 15 June 2012
- RE: ISSUE 16: parameters for rules
- ISSUE-27: Local withinText implementation
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-27 (local-within-text): Local Element within text [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- AUTO: CN=Phil Ritchie/O=VISTATEC is out of the office. (returning 25/06/2012)
- Re: Note on its:term
- [All] please don't send "orphan" mails
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-26 (post-editing-related-datacats): Post editing related datacats [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-25 (dublin-core-existing-metadata-fields): Existing metadata fields in Dublin core [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-24 (its-term-change-proposal): Proposal to change ITS term [MLW-LT Standard Draft]
- Re: Note on its:term
Thursday, 14 June 2012
- ISSUE-22: Provenance, and the W3C PROV-XG
- Re: Note on its:term
- Note on its:term
- QA errors - "active" flag
Wednesday, 13 June 2012
- RE: ISSUE 16: parameters for rules
- Some input from EDI-TA (posteding methodology research)
- Example for "domain" data category - how to map domain information
- ITS proposed data categories and the Dublin Core
- Re: ISSUE-9: idValue
- RE: ISSUE-9: idValue
- ITS Project Information proposed data categories and the Dublin Core
- Re: ISSUE 9: idValue
- ISSUE 9: idValue
Tuesday, 12 June 2012
Monday, 11 June 2012
- Re: Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
- Re: ISSUE-20 ACTION-102 Resolution of global usage of ITS in HTML5
- RE: ISSUE 16: parameters for rules
- RE: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- ISSUE-20 ACTION-102 Resolution of global usage of ITS in HTML5
Sunday, 10 June 2012
- Re: ISSUE-22: Provenance, and the W3C PROV-XG
- Re: ISSUE-22: Provenance, and the W3C PROV-XG
- Re: ISSUE 16: parameters for rules
- [all] please provide update on your actions in this thread
- Update: MLW workshop Dublin Overview of issues to be discussed on 12-13 June (Tuesday-Wednesday)
Saturday, 9 June 2012
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
Friday, 8 June 2012
- Re: Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
- ISSUE-22: Provenance, and the W3C PROV-XG
- Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
- RE: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- RE: ISSUE 16: parameters for rules
Thursday, 7 June 2012
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: REMINDER (Re: [All] IMPORTANT: feedback about ITS 2.0 implementation plans by 10 June)
- RE: REMINDER (Re: [All] IMPORTANT: feedback about ITS 2.0 implementation plans by 10 June)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- RE: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- MLW workshop Dublin: Overview of issues to be discussed on 12-13 June (Tuesday-Wednesday)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
- REMINDER (Re: [All] IMPORTANT: feedback about ITS 2.0 implementation plans by 10 June)
- Re: ISSUE 16: parameters for rules
Tuesday, 5 June 2012
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology
- RE: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology
Monday, 4 June 2012
- RE: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: ITS 2 namespace URI
- ITS 2 namespace URI
- ISSUE 16: parameters for rules
Saturday, 2 June 2012
- Come to META-FORUM 2012
- [all] actions from 31 May call
- ACTION-99: Clarify Issue 14
- [all] future scribes, please volunteer
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- [All] IMPORTANT: feedback about ITS 2.0 implementation plans by 10 June