- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:59:22 +0200
- To: Michael Kruppa <Michael.Kruppa@cocomore.com>
- Cc: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAL58czqCNhSV=wfajzpXpDaycUGkBrDDSBv=jWcw-DbU73TNbg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Michael, 2012/7/31 Michael Kruppa <Michael.Kruppa@cocomore.com> > Hi Yves, all, > > thanks for your feedback. > > If I understood Felix correctly, we need drafts on any data category we > want to include by today, right? We don't need the final draft. Having a first version by tonight is sufficient. So no worries :) Felix > Unfortunately, I won't have the time to deal with this in all detail today > (which is why I wrote the first draft over the weekend). > > @all: Please feel free to work on the draft today, since I won't be able > to do it. > > Regarding your notes: > > 1) I see your point and if we find a volunteer to split the draft into two > drafts, I would be very happy with it. > > 2) I'm generally not opposed to the regex based solution for forbidden > chars. However, I'm not a regex expert at all. So, if we agree to go with > Arle's proposal, we would need a volunteer to adapt the draft accordingly. > > 3) What kind of pointer do you mean? > > 4) Agreed. I have to confess that I just copy&pasted the text without > thinking too much about it. Thanks for pointing this out. > > > Cheers > > Micha > ________________________________________ > Dr. Michael Kruppa, Senior IT-Consultant > Tel.: +49 69 972 69 189 Fax: +49 69 972 69 204; E-Mail: > michael.kruppa@cocomore.com > Cocomore AG, Gutleutstraße 30, D-60329 Frankfurt > Internet: http://www.cocomore.de Facebook: > http://www.facebook.com/cocomore Google+: http://plus.cocomore.de > Cocomore ist aktives Mitglied im World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) und im > Bundesverband Digitale Wirtschaft (BVDW) > Cocomore is active member of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) > Vorstand: Dr. Hans-Ulrich von Freyberg (Vors.), Dr. Jens Fricke, Marc > Kutschera, Vors. des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Velasco, Sitz: Frankfurt/Main, > Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main, HRB 51114 > > dmexco 2012 in Köln: Besuchen Sie unseren Messestand auf der > internationalen Leitmesse für die Digitale Wirtschaft am 12. und 13. > September 2012. Sie finden uns in Halle 7, Stand E057. > dmexco 2012 in Cologne: Come to see us on September 12 and 13 at the > Digital Marketing Exposition and Conference (hall 7, stand E057). > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 30. Juli 2012 14:48 > An: Michael Kruppa; public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > Betreff: RE: [all] Call for consensus on specialRequirements > > Hi Michael, all, > > Thanks for the text and examples, and to help this to move forward. > > I have a few notes so far: > > > 1) Two vs. One > > Those two constraints could probably be split into two data categories. > Besides being constrains they have little in common. Having them separated > may also help in implementation: some tools may implement only one rather > than none. > > > 2) List for forbidden Characters > > Instead of the very basic list of Unicode code points, I think we could go > the extra length and use a very simple regex based on Arle's proposal here: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jul/0143.html > But maybe limiting it to the [] ^ - (and \uHHHH) functions. The notation > would also make [] optional so even forbiddenChars="abc" would be fine (= > "[abc]" > > - Those are supported as far as I can tell by all regex engine without > mapping. > - they would make ranges a lot easier to declare. > > > 3) Do we want pointers in the global rule? > > This would add the capability to map non-native-ITS constructs to be > mapped to the data category/ies (as long as the values are the same). > > > 4) Scope (a general remark, not just for this data category) > > The text says: "The information applies to the textual content of the > element, including child elements, but excluding attributes." > > Why do we say (here and in many other places) "the information applies to > the textual content of the element"? If the selector points to an attribute > node (that could be translatable), then the information applies to the > value of the attribute not to any textual content of the element. > > Would there be a better way to word this text? Something like: > > When the selection is an element node the information applies to the > textual content of the element, including child elements, but excluding > attributes. When the selection is an attribute node, the information > applies to the value of the selected attribute. > > > Cheers > -yves > > > > -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 07:59:47 UTC