W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > July 2012

Re: [all] Call for consensus on specialRequirements

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:59:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL58czqCNhSV=wfajzpXpDaycUGkBrDDSBv=jWcw-DbU73TNbg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Kruppa <Michael.Kruppa@cocomore.com>
Cc: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Hi Michael,

2012/7/31 Michael Kruppa <Michael.Kruppa@cocomore.com>

> Hi Yves, all,
>
> thanks for your feedback.
>
> If I understood Felix correctly, we need drafts on any data category we
> want to include by today, right?


We don't need the final draft. Having a first version by tonight is
sufficient. So no worries :)

Felix



> Unfortunately, I won't have the time to deal with this in all detail today
> (which is why I wrote the first draft over the weekend).
>
> @all: Please feel free to work on the draft today, since I won't be able
> to do it.
>
> Regarding your notes:
>
> 1) I see your point and if we find a volunteer to split the draft into two
> drafts, I would be very happy with it.
>
> 2) I'm generally not opposed to the regex based solution for forbidden
> chars. However, I'm not a regex expert at all. So, if we agree to go with
> Arle's proposal, we would need a volunteer to adapt the draft accordingly.
>
> 3) What kind of pointer do you mean?
>
> 4) Agreed. I have to confess that I just copy&pasted the text without
> thinking too much about it. Thanks for pointing this out.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Micha
> ________________________________________
> Dr. Michael Kruppa, Senior IT-Consultant
> Tel.: +49 69 972 69 189 Fax: +49 69 972 69 204; E-Mail:
> michael.kruppa@cocomore.com
> Cocomore AG, Gutleutstraße 30, D-60329 Frankfurt
> Internet: http://www.cocomore.de Facebook:
> http://www.facebook.com/cocomore Google+: http://plus.cocomore.de
> Cocomore ist aktives Mitglied im World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) und im
> Bundesverband Digitale Wirtschaft (BVDW)
> Cocomore is active member of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
> Vorstand: Dr. Hans-Ulrich von Freyberg (Vors.), Dr. Jens Fricke, Marc
> Kutschera, Vors. des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Velasco, Sitz: Frankfurt/Main,
> Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main, HRB 51114
>
> dmexco 2012 in Köln: Besuchen Sie unseren Messestand auf der
> internationalen Leitmesse für die Digitale Wirtschaft am 12. und 13.
> September 2012. Sie finden uns in Halle 7, Stand E057.
> dmexco 2012 in Cologne: Come to see us on September 12 and 13 at the
> Digital Marketing Exposition and Conference (hall 7, stand E057).
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 30. Juli 2012 14:48
> An: Michael Kruppa; public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> Betreff: RE: [all] Call for consensus on specialRequirements
>
> Hi Michael, all,
>
> Thanks for the text and examples, and to help this to move forward.
>
> I have a few notes so far:
>
>
> 1) Two vs. One
>
> Those two constraints could probably be split into two data categories.
> Besides being constrains they have little in common. Having them separated
> may also help in implementation: some tools may implement only one rather
> than none.
>
>
> 2) List for forbidden Characters
>
> Instead of the very basic list of Unicode code points, I think we could go
> the extra length and use a very simple regex based on Arle's proposal here:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jul/0143.html
> But maybe limiting it to the [] ^ - (and \uHHHH) functions. The notation
> would also make [] optional so even forbiddenChars="abc" would be fine (=
> "[abc]"
>
> - Those are supported as far as I can tell by all regex engine without
> mapping.
> - they would make ranges a lot easier to declare.
>
>
> 3) Do we want pointers in the global rule?
>
> This would add the capability to map non-native-ITS constructs to be
> mapped to the data category/ies (as long as the values are the same).
>
>
> 4) Scope (a general remark, not just for this data category)
>
> The text says: "The information applies to the textual content of the
> element, including child elements, but excluding attributes."
>
> Why do we say (here and in many other places) "the information applies to
> the textual content of the element"? If the selector points to an attribute
> node (that could be translatable), then the information applies to the
> value of the attribute not to any textual content of the element.
>
> Would there be a better way to word this text? Something like:
>
> When the selection is an element node the information applies to the
> textual content of the element, including child elements, but excluding
> attributes. When the selection is an attribute node, the information
> applies to the value of the selected attribute.
>
>
> Cheers
> -yves
>
>
>
>


-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 07:59:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:31:47 UTC