- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:27:05 +0100
- To: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Hi Dave, thanks a lot for this. Some comments below. On 2012-12-06 14:12, Dave Lewis wrote: > Hi Felix, all, > Some items of future planning that we should start discussing on the > monday WG call: > > 1) Tidying up requirements documentation: i think it would be worth > just adding some further structure the the requirements at: > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Requirements > to separate out the requirements that were actually met in the spec > (with data category references) and those that were not in a form > that > could be pick up easily by future ITSers We might consider to - make a "real usage case and requirements document" out of http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary since it use cases here map 1:1 to implementations, and - for the rest of the requirements that are not covered by the implementations. It would basically mean to make an easy to read text out of http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary and could also help our preparation for Rome. The requirements document http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Requirements is IMO in many areas "far away" from how the actual implementations have developed. That's OK, but for publishing a useful requirements and UC doc, it might make sense to use http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary as a start. > > 2) Planning breakdown of best practice work in 2013. We have a number > of seeded activities that could be turned into valuable best > practice, > including: > a) the EU project deliverables: > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Deliverables > b) use case demonstrations: > > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Implementation_Commitments#Use_Case_Demonstrations I would definitely replace the b) link with http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary it is OK to provide detailed info in addition, but we should IMO start from a high level umbrella and get this done well. > c) the ITS/XLIFF mapping > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/XLIFF_Mapping This depends also on the latest state in the XLIFF TC. Maybe we can get an update on that before the Monday call by some of you guys directly involved? > d) process definitions and create/read/update/delete mapping to ITs > annotations > > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Metadata_and_workflow_comparison Not sure if we should do this. Or to put it differently: we are not forced to do any of the items mentioned in the mail. We just should see which item gets "many" volunteers to actually work on . > > 3) scheduling some wiki tidying, removing unused pages etc +1. Best, Felix > > cheers, > Dave
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2012 13:27:31 UTC