- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:57:32 +0200
- To: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAL58czpg2HvS9UhG_COLuqnJvePzdcJpb51p-=vbddgcTCL9rQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012/8/31 Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie> > Yves, > Apologies for being slow to follow up. > > Should we therefore make explicit in the definition of the its language > information data category that the xml:lang value takes precedence when > both match a node? > > I see we made a similar statement in relation to xml:id and its:idValue in > the latter's specification. > > Also would this cause issues with ITS1.0 compatability? > We would at least need a test case for this, following the rules of xml:id vs. its:idValue which can be testet here http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#EX-idvalue-attribute-1 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/examples/xml/EX-idvalue-attribute-1.xml Any volunteer to create the test case for language information? Leroy or Dave / Dom, can you add http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/examples/xml/EX-idvalue-attribute-1.xml to the test suite? Side note: http://phaedrus.scss.tcd.ie/its2.0/inputdata/idvalue/html/idvalue1Html.html is borken, it seems. Felix > > cheers, > Dave > > > On 28/08/2012 13:06, Yves Savourel wrote: > >> Hi Dave, >> >> My understanding is that xml:lang wins. >> (like xml:space wins in Preserve Space) >> >> -yves >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dave Lewis [mailto:dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 5:45 AM >> To: Multilingual Web LT Public List >> Subject: [all] query on language information >> >> Hi, >> I'm sure this was discussed in ITS1.0. >> >> If you have a node with an xml:language value for one language but which >> also matches the selector of a its language information rule specifying >> another language, can we determine which should apply. >> >> The text indicate the its attribute can be used to map to alternative to >> xml:lang, but it doesn't (and probably can't) prohibit its coexistence. >> >> cheers, >> Dave >> >> >> >> > > -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Friday, 31 August 2012 09:58:01 UTC