- From: Karl Fritsche <karl.fritsche@cocomore.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 10:47:59 +0200
- To: <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
Hi, okay this would explain this. But why we not even replace parameters in the output of the Pointer? I would agree that the pointer is the information here and maybe it should be processed this far, that parameters are replaced and its ready to process for the corresponding element. Only my two cents. Cheers Karl On 06.05.2013 23:43, Yves Savourel wrote: > hi Karl, > >> Second Point is the target pointer. On every data category we >> resolve pointers, why not here? Why is the output simply the >> XPath and not like everywhere else the resolved pointer? >> It would be somehow hacky in my implementation to get back >> there and getting the XPath. > In all other data category the pointer is a way to get to the information for the gven data category. > In Target Pointer the Xpath expression is the information itself. > > Hope this helps, > -yves >
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 08:51:37 UTC