- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:32:47 +0200
- To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>, "'Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public'" <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2013 06:34:16 UTC
Yes, xml:id makes no sense here, we should replace it with something like ref in both <par> and <legalnotice> and the rules.
It seems to be the case for most files in the xml tests for Provenance.
-ys
From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:13 AM
To: Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public
Subject: Question on https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/pull/22/
Hi all,
see
https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/pull/22/
and the proposed change at
https://github.com/garfieldnate/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/commit/1417ef0408876a0bc525d1e9b51c5e5b7c016197
garfieldnate is right about xml:id. I am just wondering whether xml:id is the right attribute here. Or should the file (relevent
part below) rather look like this?
<its:rules version="2.0">
<its:provRule selector="/text/body/par"
provenanceRecordsRefPointer="@ref"/>
<its:provRule selector="/text/body/legalnotice"
provenanceRecordsRefPointer="@ref"/>
</its:rules>
<title>Translation Revision Provenance Agent: Global Test in XML</title>
<body>
<par ref="#pr1"> This paragraph was translated from the machine.</par>
<legalnotice ref="#pr2">This text was
translated directly by a person.</legalnotice>
</body>
Best,
Felix
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2013 06:34:16 UTC