RE: within text html4 output

Hi Leroy,

No I think you understood the wiki page.

But that last p element is at the receiving end of a global rule which should override the default.

<p id=’copyright’> and we have:

<its:withinTextRule selector="//h:p[@id=$withinparam]" withinText="yes"/>

with

<its:param name="withinparam">copyright</its:param>

so, to me, that p should be withinText='yes'

Put it another way: The default has not changed for p elements, so the result should be the same.
-ys


From: Leroy Finn [mailto:finnle@tcd.ie] 
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 6:15 PM
To: Yves Savourel
Cc: Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public
Subject: Re: within text html4 output

Hey Yves,

I discussed this on a mail on Friday. See mail here:

The only change seems to be in withintext4html. This change is based on the fact that only phrasing elements listed here http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/HTML5_Defaults#Elements_Within_Text are within text.
The changes can be seen here: https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/commit/71f62343a383a411c9069f671ed1e26acf65dde8
Any thoughts or did i miss anything?

Have I misunderstood the wiki page?

Thanks,
Leroy 

On 29 April 2013 01:06, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote:
Hi Leroy, all,

I noticed that the last p element in the html4 test of Element Within Text is now 'no':
https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/commit/71f62343a383a411c9069f671ed1e26acf65dde8

But I'm not sure why. The input file seems to be the same and there that last p element has the id 'copyright' and the rules should still make it withinText='yes', no?

<its:rules xmlns:its="http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its" xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" version="2.0">
<its:param name="withinparam">copyright</its:param>
<its:withinTextRule selector="//h:span|//h:img|//h:em" withinText="yes"/>
<its:withinTextRule selector="//h:cite" withinText="nested"/>
<its:withinTextRule selector="//h:section/h:span" withinText="no"/>
<its:withinTextRule selector="//h:p[@id=$withinparam]" withinText="yes"/>

or am I missing something?

Thanks,
-yves

Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 00:30:54 UTC