- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:32:10 +0200
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- CC: 'Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public' <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
Am 01.04.13 14:23, schrieb Yves Savourel: > Hi Jirka, all, > > I think removing the ITS version in the <its:rules> elements that are embedded in <script> is wrong (See https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/commit/5be69bf9cebe40c83bada8470384546bd67cb425 for example in locqualityissue10html.html or provenance2html.html, etc). > > I don't mind if it's not in <its:provenanceRecords> or <its:locQualityIssues> because, for now, they are always 2.0. > I thought ACTION-468 was only about standoff elements (issue 122: https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/122) not rules. > > We need the version information in <its:rules>. +1 - I think the point Jirka made for "the HTML parser will see content of script as a string" is true, but a common workflow could include "converting HTML5 into XHTML+ITS via https://github.com/kosek/html5-its-tools ", and then do "normal" XML processing of the rules. > It doesn't matter whether the rules are inside an HTML script or not: we parse it as XML and don't want to make special case depending on where the document was stored. +1. To re-store the version in rules inside HTML, I think the spec actually doesn't need a change - http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#its-version-attribute doesn't talk about HTML rules files and version information - the same for http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#html5-markup Best, Felix
Received on Monday, 1 April 2013 12:32:28 UTC