Re: Important for Implementors - can you make deadlines?

Hi Pablo,

Am 30.11.12 11:07, schrieb Pablo Nieto Caride:
> Hi Dom, Felix,
>
> Regarding M2, do implementers need to stick to the initial description of
> the milestone? or as discussed on Monday, is it enough if we implement all
> the features of one or several data categories but not just one feature of
> all of them?

Your approach is OK too if that data category includes both global and 
local.

Best,

Felix

>
> Cheers,
> Pablo.
>
> Dear All.
>
> As minuted yesterday (http://www.w3.org/2012/11/26-mlw-lt-minutes.html):
>
>   <DomJones1> Wanted to ask / minute that if any implementors
>     have any issues with keeping to test-suite dates could they
>     please let Dominic know as soon as possible. This way we can
>     work with you to match resources and the time frame.
>
> So if you have issues with keeping to the milestone dates below, please let
> me know as soon as possible, that we can work on a solution in line with the
> milestones / key dates. Not hearing back presumes your ok with the dates and
> happy with your resources / the timeframe.
>
> Best Regards.
>
> Dom.
>
>
>
>
>
> M1:     15th November 2012 - (Test files reviewed) - Ongoing process.
> M1.5:  4th December 2012 - Webinar on Test Suite conformance / usage.
> M2:     17th December 2012 - Implementors have run at least one global and
> one local test file, for each of their data categories. One XML and one HTML
> as well.
> M3:     31st January 2013 - Test files completely run.
> M4:     8th March 2013 - Data category used in application, spreadsheet
> updated with conformant / non-conformant implementations.
> M5:    15th March 2013 - MLW-LT review - Presentation on test process and
> 80% of data categories shown to be conform ant.
>
>
>
> --
> Dominic Jones | Research Assistant
> KDEG, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 11:44:30 UTC