Re: locqualityissuexml - locQualityIssueEnabled

Yeah I agree with doing it using the always way as it will match in with
the other output files. If there is no objections I think we should go
ahead with this and get the output files more stable.

Leroy


On 14 December 2012 12:49, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote:

> Hi Leroy, implementers of LQI, all,
>
>
> I saw that you updated locqualityissue3xmloutput.txt
>
> https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/commit/f0d00c75f54fce96653ed7b00f49890e7c46ef16
>
> Thanks for that.
>
> Could we decide about when to represent locQualityIssueEnabled soon?
> See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Dec/0069.html
>
> - a) always
> - b) only when the value is different from the default
>
> Currently we output it when locQualityIssueEnabled is defined. But not all
> implementations can do this as it has a default value, so when a decorated
> node has a 'yes' it can be either from the default or from a declaration.
>
> I think we have been outputting defaults in other data categories, so a)
> is probably the logical way to go. Note that either a) or b) means changing
> a few output files.
>
> cheers,
> -yves
>
>
>
>