- From: Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:25:17 +0000
- To: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>
- Cc: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, Dominic Jones <Dominic.Jones@cs.tcd.ie>, Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMYWBwvcvOBWhN=jwQi7VK_jnTmzdZBzYPKrfDrhh5DxzFjcCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hey Phil, I have actually noted a note here on xml 3 and 4 and html 1 for LQI Yves mailed about it earlier to the list. I will look into resolving those tomorrow all other LQI files and outputs are correct. Leroy On 13 December 2012 17:17, Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie> wrote: > Well spotted Phil that seems to be an old output file I will correct that > now. > > Thanks, > Leroy > > > On 13 December 2012 17:10, Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie> wrote: > >> Leroy >> >> locqualityissue3xmloutput.txt seems to have output from another source >> file in it? locQualityIssuesRef="#1234"? >> >> Phil. >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie> >> To: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, >> Cc: Dominic Jones <Dominic.Jones@cs.tcd.ie>, Multilingual Web >> LT-TESTS Public <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>, Phil Ritchie < >> philr@vistatec.ie> >> Date: 13/12/2012 14:15 >> Subject: Re: locqualityissuexml >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> >> Hey Phil, >> >> We have recently updated the input files to reflect the changes in the >> draft so you will have to re run the output also we have added in tests for >> standoff markup as well. The only major thing that will cause problem for >> your parser is the standoff markup. The rest of the files should output >> fine we had to do one or two corrections in relation to using "spelling" >> instead of "misspelling" for its:locQualityIssueType. So once that is re >> ran you should be fine for the commitment on Monday. >> >> Thanks, >> Leroy >> >> >> On 13 December 2012 13:18, Dave Lewis <*dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie*<dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>> >> wrote: >> i'm probably behind the curve here, but do do we have something in place >> where we post these results up and somehow get them checked and formally >> 'passed' >> >> cheers, >> Dave >> >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> *Subject: * >> locqualityissuexml >> *Resent-Date: * >> Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:50:55 +0000 >> *Resent-From: * >> *public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org*<public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org> >> *Date: * >> Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:50:01 +0000 >> *From: * >> Phil Ritchie *<philr@vistatec.ie>* <philr@vistatec.ie> >> *To: * >> *public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org*<public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org> >> >> >> Leroy >> >> Attached is our output for all xml locqualityissue tests except those >> that use its:param. We're working on the html. >> >> >> >> Phil. >> >> >> ************************************************************ >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they >> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify >> the sender immediately by e-mail. >> >> *www.vistatec.com* <http://www.vistatec.com/> >> ************************************************************ >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************ >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they >> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify >> the sender immediately by e-mail. >> >> www.vistatec.com >> ************************************************************ >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 17:25:44 UTC