Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - Proposed Recommendation 24 September 2013 - Typo related to mapping between ITS and XLIFF?

Hi,

While looking at

http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-its20-20130924/#mapping-XLIFF

I wondered whether

>The mapping between ITS and XLIFF therefore unpins several important ITS 2.0 usage scenarios [MLW US IMPL]. These usage scenarios involve:

should rather be

>The mapping between ITS and XLIFF therefore _underpins_ several important ITS 2.0 usage scenarios [MLW US IMPL]. These usage scenarios involve:

Best regards,
Christian