W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Comments on section 7 of ITS 2.0

From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 13:28:36 +0200
Message-ID: <51D6ADE4.10501@kosek.cz>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
CC: public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org
On 5.7.2013 13:09, Daniel Glazman wrote:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/its20/#its-version-attribute
> 
> It's not expensive, Jirka, it's hacky. It try to avoid hacky
> things in specs :-)

As @its:version is mandatory in XML documents I don't see what is
"hacky" on checking its presence. We can consider requiring this
attribute on the root element which will make checking easier. But
checking for attribute is definitively more robust then checking for
namespace declaration.

				Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bringing you XML Prague conference    http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------


Received on Friday, 5 July 2013 11:29:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:32:28 UTC