Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD

We could also state that the object pointed to by its-loc-quality-profile-ref (currently undefined) can be a set of ISO/TS-11669-compliant specifications. Since that leaves other options open, it doesn't make any normative change to the specification.

-Arle

On 2013 Jan 15, at 12:29 , Arle Lommel <arle.lommel@dfki.de> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> A few notes on the quality sections:
> 
> 1. There is a minor typo in the listing of quality categories (in part I wrote, no less).
> 
> A professzor azt modta Smithnek, hogy he would hear from his lawyer.
> 
> Should read
> 
> A professzor azt mondta Smithnek, hogy he would hear from his lawyer.
> 
> 
> 2. Section 8.17.1 should mention that a determination of what issue categories are appropriate for consideration depends on the nature of the project and that for more information on setting project specifications, readers may consult ISO/TS-11669. This reference is non-normative, but it is essential to show that the ITS 2.0 quality model is related to broader standards-based trends in this area. This will also add ISO/TS-11669 to the list of references.
> 
> I will work on the needed text in the next few days and submit it.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Arle

Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 12:01:55 UTC