Thursday, 28 February 2013
- AW: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
- AW: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
- Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
- Fwd: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76
- Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
- Re: issue-113 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD)
- Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
- Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
- Re: issue-113 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD)
- Re: [ISSUE-102] I18N-ISSUE-242: Clarify case-insensitive match for domains [ITS-20]
- Re: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76
Wednesday, 27 February 2013
- Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
- Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434]
- Re: issue-113 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD)
- Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434]
- Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434]
- RE: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
- RE: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434]
- Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434]
- Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434]
- RE: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76
- [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76, Re: [Issue-76] clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed
- Re: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76
- [Issue-76] clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed
- RE: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type)
- Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
Monday, 25 February 2013
Saturday, 23 February 2013
Friday, 22 February 2013
- RE: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type)
- issue-73 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - NLP Interchange Format (NIF) - 1.0/2.0, Canonical XML, Unicode Normalization Forms)
- Re: [Issue-70] Defined order of precedence missing inherited local values [Action-437]
- [Issue-70] Defined order of precedence missing inherited local values [Action-437]
- Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
- Fwd: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term)
- Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type)
Thursday, 21 February 2013
- Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type)
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type)
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type)
Wednesday, 20 February 2013
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type)
- RE: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418]
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type)
Monday, 18 February 2013
- Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list
- Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list
- [ISSUE-79] Re: I18N-ISSUE-204: Use of namespaces and HTML [.prep-ITS-20]) [ACTION-393]
Friday, 15 February 2013
- edits to resolve MLW-LT issue-86 issue-90 issue-101
- Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
Thursday, 14 February 2013
Tuesday, 12 February 2013
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418]
- Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
Monday, 11 February 2013
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418]
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418]
Thursday, 7 February 2013
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418]
- Re: I18N-ISSUE-217: Missing support for localizable items that are not translatable [ITS-20]
Tuesday, 5 February 2013
- RE: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434]
- RE: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434]
- RE: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434]
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type)
Sunday, 3 February 2013
- Re: [ISSUE-82] Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD, i18n-ISSUE-208: Mapping domains to nothing [ACTION-401]
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418]
- Re: [ISSUE-108] locNote ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-417]
- issue-73, comment 3b
- Re: [ACTION-385] Common regular expression syntax
- RE: [ACTION-385] Common regular expression syntax
- Re: [ACTION-385] Common regular expression syntax
- Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type)
Friday, 1 February 2013
- Re: How to handle non HTML formats embedded in HTML (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML)
- Re: How to handle non HTML formats embedded in HTML (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML)
- Re: How to handle non HTML formats embedded in HTML (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML)
- Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML
- RE: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML
- Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML
- RE: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML
- Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML
- RE: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML