- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:49:53 +0100
- To: Abel Rionda <abel.rionda@fundacionctic.org>
- CC: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
OK. Thanks for the replies. I'll use this list then! Francois. Abel Rionda wrote: > Hi Francois, > > It sounds good. I think it's better to have only > one list for all the checker stuff. > > Regards, > Abel. > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org] En nombre de Francois > Daoust > Enviado el: viernes, 31 de octubre de 2008 17:24 > Para: public-mobileok-checker > Asunto: Mailing-list for the feedback on the W3C mobileOK Checker > service > > > Hi Checker guys, > > I am currently trying to improve the W3C mobileOK Checker service > interface, frontend of the Java library on the W3C servers: > http://validator.w3.org/mobile > (no changes yet) > > As part of the changes I will make to the interface, I will add some > feedback page that encourages people to send bugs and/or complaints to > some public mailing-list, something similar to, though not as detailed > for the time being: > http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html > > I was wondering whether I could use this mailing-list or whether I > should rather create another dedicated one. > > I understand the User Interface is not a deliverable of the Task Force > but part of the feedback is likely to be on the Java library itself. > > I don't expect we'll receive lots of emails, and I am not thinking about > > adding "replying to the feedback received" as a work item for the > Checker task force either. I just thought that having one forum for both > > the UI and the library seems better than two, especially since our job > on the Checker is essentially done, so we're moving to maintenance > mode... > > What do you think? Good idea? Bad idea? > > Francois. > >
Received on Monday, 3 November 2008 11:51:00 UTC