- From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:52:21 -0400
- To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
OK I think we are in agreement then. I am, personally, willing to treat it as a known issue in the checker, which has little practical impact. I am happy to leave the BP alone. On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote: > > > Going back to Dom's earlier advice not to test declared validity, I think the value here is to not so much to say: > > "You say you're a Ham Sandwich, you're not, and neither are you valid XHTML Basic" > > So much as > > "You say you're valid XHTML, you are, but unfortunately you're not valid XHTML Basic." > > Which I think is worthwhile, although it doesn't reach the minimalist level recommended by Dom. > > If we are going to make this change then I suppose that needs to be reflected in mobileOK Basic, and we need to firm up on the idea of "Well Known" DTDs (and their locations) and make that normative, I think. > > Either way, the conversation needs to be had on the BP List etc. > > Jo
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 13:52:41 UTC