- From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:26:02 -0400
- To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>, public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
So is the emerging consensus to just ignore validation against the stated DTD, if it's something we don't know about? Good, because that is how I made it work just now. On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > > Le mardi 11 mars 2008 à 21:54 +0000, Jo Rabin a écrit : > > > So I wonder what the value, really, is of testing against a declared DTD? The reason it is there, if I remember correctly, is to deal with XHTML-MP. But we do, anyway, so this is perhaps a legacy issue. > > I remember having argued that we shouldn't care about > validity-to-declared DTD, but I think the group eventually chose to go > in a different direction... > > Do - I told you so - m :) > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:26:21 UTC