- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:59:10 +0100
- To: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
Some bugs highlighted below when checking HTML 4.01 documents... Dom -------- Message transféré -------- > À: dom@w3.org > Sujet: MobileOK Validator Issues > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 02:57:05 -0800 > > > > Hi Dominique, > > > I've found some issues with the mobileOK validator behavior when > attempting to validate a document with an HTML 4.01 Strict doctype. I > don't have time to deal with signing up for a mailing list or whatever > so I'll just drop this off with you to deal with : ) > > > This is sent from a one-time Gmail account so, sorry, you won't be > able to get back to me. > > > > ==Failure Message #1:== > > > Note that this failure message appear twice -- citing the same page > line number. > > > "The document is an HTML document and it fails > > to validate according to its given DOCTYPE: The > > declaration for the entity "ContentType" must end with '>'. > > (per CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT)". > > > This is not true -- the document is valid according to its doctype. An > appropriate failure message (appearing one time) would be: > > > "This document uses an HTML DOCTYPE; > > the XHTML Basic DOCTYPE is required for mobileOK > > validation. (per WHATEVER SPECIFICATION)" > > > There may be similar issues with non-Basic XHTML, and XML, doctypes. > > > > ==Failure Message #2:== > > > Note that this failure message appear twice -- citing the same page > line number. > > > "The document does not validate against the XHTML Basic > > 1.1 DTD nor MP 1.2: Document root element "html", must > > match DOCTYPE root "HTML". (per CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT)" > > > This is not true -- the document root and DOCTYPE declaration do match > (both HTML). This failure message should not occur. > > > > ==Additional Issue== > > > Note a general problem for mobileOK with this failure message, if an > unclosed empty tag is found: > > > "The document does not validate against the > > XHTML Basic 1.1 DTD nor MP 1.2: The element > > type "link" must be terminated by the matching > > end-tag "</link>". (per CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT)" > > > The phrasing of this message is inaccurate as (if I'm not mistaken) an > empty tag can be validly terminated in XHTML/XML with a closing slash > in the single empty tag as well as a matching end-tag. > > > Thanks >
Received on Saturday, 8 March 2008 18:59:37 UTC