- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:07:18 +0200
- To: Abel Rionda <abel.rionda@fundacionctic.org>
- CC: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
Thanks Abel, Abel Rionda wrote: > Hi Francois, > > It is fixed now (We attach a pair of files because strangely we don't > have access to the CVS... "connection refused by the server"). Well, it seems to be fixed, I saw you committed the changes ;-) While re-thinking about it, I realized that, whilst we need to validate against both DTDs, the detailed report the checker should return should be against one and only DTD. mobileOK doesn't prescribe the DTD to use (it only prescribes the fact that a FAIL is returned). I felt it made more sense to always return errors against the XHTML Basic 1.1 DTD because: 1. we don't validate the page against XHTML MP 1.2 when it is valid against XHTML Basic 1.1 2. apart from the "start" attribute on the "ol" element (and maybe one or two additional attributes?), XHTML Basic 1.1 is a superset of XHTML MP 1.2. I updated the code consequently. I also included a note in HTTPXHTMLResource.java to point out that exceptions thrown by the SAX parser are ignored for the moment. I don't know when such exceptions are thrown, provided they are. But ignoring such exceptions means that the checker will continue its execution as though the page was fully validated (and will only return markup errors encountered when the exception was thrown). > > Regarding a possible call today, we suggest cancelling it because we > haven't had too much time to work on the last bugs reported by you [1]. > Meanwhile we can use the mailing list. OK. As you probably noticed, I spent some time digging up in the code to debug it. There remains bugs, but no "blocking" bugs AFAICT (at least for the time being). I still haven't updated the online checker, but should do so in a near future. I keep you updated. Francois. > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobileok-checker/2008Jul/0056 > .html > > Regards, > > Abel. > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org] En nombre de Francois > Daoust > Enviado el: martes, 15 de julio de 2008 18:36 > Para: public-mobileok-checker > Asunto: Validation against XHTML MP 1.2 not done by the checker > > > Hi, > > I just committed the test: > CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT 21 > > It's a valid XHTML MP 1.2 page, which is not a valid XHTML Basic 1.1 > (the only way to do that, AFAICT, is by using a "start" attribute on an > "ol" element. There may be other ways, but the thing is: it is > possible...). > > The checker returns an error CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT-6 because it seems > it only validates the page against the XHTML Basic 1.1 DTD. The page > should be mobileOK though. > > Francois.
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2008 11:07:52 UTC