- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:38:39 +0200
- To: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
Hi,
The minutes of today's call are available at:
http://www.w3.org/2008/07/09-bpwg-minutes.html
... and copied as text below.
In short: a candidate release of the checker v1.0 should be issued
tomorrow. Testing is needed. And then some more testing. And then...
er... testing.
Francois.
09 Jul 2008
[2]Agenda
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobileok-checker/2008Jul/0037.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2008/07/09-bpwg-irc
Attendees
Present
francois, miguel, abel
Regrets
dom
Chair
miguel
Scribe
francois
Contents
* [4]Topics
* [5]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
abel: CSS rules were updated
... object processing rule in Java is finished
<abel> Fixed Bug 5762 (CSS at rules)-->
[6]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobileok-checker/2008J
ul/0034.html
[6]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobileok-checker/2008Jul/0034.html
abel: so the main issue re. object processing can be closed
... some tests still need to be done before we commit the changes
... Should be done by tomorrow, so we could announce we have a
candidate release to the WG
... and then test, test, test
... francois, what about updating the online checker?
<abel> francois: We will publish a new beta checker as online
checker in the next days
<abel> .... There is several news this month: BPs as candidate,
mobileOK Basic Tests as Candidate, and the checker should be
launched at the same time
miguel: our plan: close the remaining bug tomorrow. Call for review
of the checker during a few days.
... we have to work on several other topics, so we need help for
testing
francois: my proposal:
... 1. tomorrow, let's announce the candidate release to the BPWG
... 2. ask them to review/test the checker carefully
... 3. I'll update the online checker at
[7]http://validator.w3.org/mobile
... still as a beta version
... 4. Let's blog a bit about the fact that we almost have a v1.0
... 5. publish version 1.0 for July 22
[7] http://validator.w3.org/mobile
miguel: agreed. Re 2., we should ask them to try the checker with
some pages. But we cannot ask them to look precisely at the code.
... They should check the output of the mobileOK checker to ensure
that it matches the spec.
francois: what about the documentation?
miguel: needs to be updated. By July 22?
francois: I can't promise that I'll have time, but if you agree, I
can try to update the documentation myself
miguel: you're most welcome.
francois: thanks a lot!
[session adjourned]
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2008 15:39:12 UTC