- From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:38:01 -0400
- To: "Roland Gülle" <roland@7val.com>
- Cc: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
Yeah I think that's fine. I mean, don't put yourself to too much trouble, it's not that important. But it seems nice to be consistent. Hmm. But then again, we wouldn't want to write a message like "warn: foo bar baz". It looks wrong in comparison to "Warn: foo bar baz". "WARN: foo bar baz" seems too different from what the document does. Arg, thoughts? Let's get this right once. Sean On 9/18/07, Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com> wrote: > > The mobileOK document uses 'warn', at least in the last couple drafts: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/ > > > > I think this is the intended convention in any event. > sorry for this confusion, you are right! > (the mobileOKBasicDocCheckerSyncTest also reports this, but I don't > understand my own result report...) > > So we have to change the tests (and test-tests). > > Should I do a global sed/awk search-replace session? > > roland > >
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:38:18 UTC