- From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:28:16 -0400
- To: "Roland Gülle" <roland@7val.com>
- Cc: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
The mobileOK document uses 'warn', at least in the last couple drafts: http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/ I think this is the intended convention in any event. On 9/18/07, Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com> wrote: > > I think we explicitly used "warn" instead of "WARN" in the test text > > to avoid confusion. I don't think it's a big deal, but would like to > > see "warn" used everywhere for consistency, including test output. > Actually test use warn, the mobileOK doc use WARN. > Is this a (one of the last) comments for the mobileOK LC 3 Candidate? > > Roland >
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:28:40 UTC